Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    682
    Images
    174
    Rep Power
    82

    I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was

    SEVERAL years ago, I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was to create an even smaller robot just like himself... So much like himself, that this robot endeavored to create yet another tiny robot, ad infinitum. This continued for a while until an extremely tiny speck of robot tried to endow purpose upon a cloud of molecules with ruinous result.

    http://screamyguy.net/fractal/index.htm
    Figure 1. A fractal scene. Left mousedrag to orbit. 'a/z' to zoom or right mousedrag.

  2. #2

    Re: I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was

    Woah, trippy!

    Very cool Matt, haha
    It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. --Carl Sagan

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Posts
    378
    Images
    34
    Rep Power
    54

    Re: I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was

    Link didn't work for me (stupid Java!) but that was actually one of Drexler's "arguments" for the "inevitability" of nanotech replicators. Yeah, right -- like we've ever built ANY machine that can self-replicate, let alone a microscopic one.

  4. #4

    Re: I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was

    Not yet anyways.
    It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. --Carl Sagan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Posts
    378
    Images
    34
    Rep Power
    54

    Re: I built a robot whose sole purpose in life was

    Quote Originally Posted by archcvd View Post
    Not yet anyways.
    Don't get me wrong -- I'd love to see a machine self-replicate. I just think that we're far more likely to build a human-scale (so-called "clanking") replicator than a microscopic one. Drexler had a lot of rationalizations about how working at nano-scale was easier but I think he's nuts. We know a lot more about fabrication of parts made of zillions of atoms than we do about devices made of individual atoms.

    If I were working on the problem I would definitely focus on self-replication of machines we can actually see.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Contest Entry RC truck robot conversion
    By Orac in forum Project Showcase
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-13-2012, 11:50 PM
  2. Contest Entry The eyeRobot: Robot Blind Aid
    By Shrimpy in forum Project Showcase
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 09:20 AM
  3. [ANNOUNCE] Rat's Life: robot programming contest
    By omichel in forum Robotics General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 02:13 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 10:07 PM
  5. Kondo web page translated.
    By Droid Works in forum Humanoids, Walkers & Crawlers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-06-2007, 05:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •